Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(4)
Exact(1)
Forty-six studinitiallyally were identified, 8– 53 5 of which were excluded 49– 53 because they reported duplicate data.
Similar(59)
After review of 2,664 full articles, 2,520 were excluded: 1,814 because no data at all were available regarding diabetes, 579 because mortality data were not available, 35 because they reported only long-term mortality and 2 duplicate publications were identified.
We included both studies because they reported different outcomes.
Few studies reported duplicated QTL.
For Austria, data from 2 laboratories were pooled because these laboratories did not report duplicate isolates.
"They reported the reach in duplicated form".
When the inspector general's office audited regional agencies in 1998, it uncovered 41,000 cases that should not have been reported, either because they were duplicates or because they were ineligible for financing.
Of them, 329 were excluded by reviewing the title and abstract because they were duplicate meta-analyses, included non-randomized trials, did not report data on mortality, and other irrelevant articles.
Of these, 196 were excluded because they were duplicate studies.
396 articles were retrieved from various databases and other sources in which 72 were excluded because they were duplicate hits.
But most of these studies were not suitable for our analysis because they included duplicates, lab or animal studies, case reports, review and other study subjects irrelevant to our title.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com