Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(1)
Writing a section of society off because they "failed" at 16 or 18 is a form of barbarism.
Similar(59)
It all goes back to the fear of failure -- overachievers' public enemy No. 1 is criticism, because it implies that they failed at something, Arkin says.
Most of the time, this is because they lack self-confidence, they failed at the same venture in the past, or they feel challenged by your dedication and don't want to have to question themselves about their own weight.
The Free Democrats will be excluded from the regional parliament because they failed to win at least 5 percent of the votes, the minimum required.
The commission staff had made recommendations on which petitions should be admissible and said that Westchester, the Town of Cortlandt, Connecticut Residents Opposing the Relicensing of Indian Point and the environmental group Clearwater should all be excluded, because they failed to file at least one admissible contention.
A total of 129 patients were consecutively enrolled; 9 of them were excluded because they failed to appear at follow-up visits.
Mr. Shulman also disclosed that the I.R.S. was considering offering a second amnesty.. "We are seriously considering another voluntary disclosure," he said, adding that United States taxpayers who entered into it "will not get the same deal as those" in the previous program because they failed to come forward at their first opportunity.
In Los Angeles County, which accounts for one-fourth of all California drug arrests, about 30percentt of offenders who pleaded guilty under Proposition 36 have since had bench warrants issued for their arrests because they failed to show up at treatment centers or did not return to court for a review of their progress, Judge Marcus said.
Only 1.9% of all reads were excluded because they failed to map uniquely to at least one genome.
Four DNA samples were excluded from association analysis because they failed to generate genotypes for at least 6 of the 23 sites tested.
The statement also takes aim at the report's view that reviewers, even at the best journals, are at fault because they failed to notice the "blatant fraud" in Stapel's papers.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com