Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(5)
Exact(5)
No differences were found between the groups at T1. PRSS and PRCS results were analyzed in 25 patients (14 in Bfb group, 11 in Control group) because their questionnaires were invalid.
Of these, 113 were excluded because their questionnaires were not completely/correctly filled in.
A total of 15 subjects were excluded because their questionnaires were incomplete.
An additional 13 women were excluded – because their questionnaires were inadequately completed (n = 7), because their mammograms could not be obtained (n = 5), or because they reported an energy intake >3,500 kcal/day (n = 1) – leaving 164 for inclusion in analyses.
11 We treated those under age 18 as a separate group because their questionnaires were usually completed by parents (self-diagnosis by proxy) and their health-related behaviours were likely influenced or, for the very young, entirely managed by their parents.
Similar(55)
Between October 2003 and February 2006, 276 women were enrolled; 13 were excluded because their questionnaire was lost, their blood sample had clotted, or their country of origin was not one of those included in the study; two were excluded because of human immunodeficiency virus infection.
Although those participants lost to follow up are likely to be similar in age and education level to those analysed, we are unable to compare their characteristics because questionnaires were completed anonymously.
Because some questionnaires were not fully answered by the participants, a small proportion of the data was regarded as missing.
Forty-five weren wexcludeduded from the validity study because the questionnaires were not complete.
Because some questionnaires were not fully completed, student's numbers in the analysis vary slightly.
Responses from 393 respondents were included because 15 questionnaires were incomplete and, thus, excluded from the study.
More suggestions(16)
because their flights were
because their options were
because their trousers were
because their roots were
because their leaders were
because their targets were
because their ears were
because their authors were
because their movements were
because their families were
because their relatives were
because their innovations were
because their friends were
because their hours were
because their errors were
because their payoffs were
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com