Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(1)
Exact(3)
This follows because the node density is invariant in time.
This is because the node density near the boundary of the monitoring area is low, which leads to a void area.
This makes our hypothesis test conservative because the node density artefact tends to inflate the estimate of molecular evolutionary rate in lineages with more nodes [ 56]; thus, our estimates of rates in Xanthorrhoea are likely to err on the high side, relative to the less well-sampled sister groups.
Similar(57)
This is because if the node density increases, then the additional information required to route the messages also increases.
This is because if the node density is high, then there is a frequent chance for the transmitting node to meet its friend node and hence the message is delivered very soon to its destination.
This is because, when the node density is lower (higher), the possibilities of transmission detour become higher (lower), and thus the real number of hops between the nodes may be larger than (close to) the theoretical value derived from EEHCA.
The average query response time shown in Fig. 5 c is counter-intuitive because it decreases as the node density increases in both small and large networks.
It achieves a very long network lifetime regardless of the node density because the number of control messages does not increase with the node density.
The comparison reveals that the simulation results approach to the theoretical lower bound with the increase of the node density, because the distance between pairwise relay node achieved from the routing scheme is more and more near the optimal transmission distance at each hop when the node density increases.
The difference between TREE and TREE-D becomes larger as the node density increases, because there are more nodes to share the burden of forwarding packets.
Though we assume a disc-shaped sensing terrain for mathematical simplicity, our model enables to simply determine the optimal number of clusters because it only requires information on the node density, the area of sensing terrain, and the radio range to find a solution.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com