Is there any risk of bias in the answers the system gives because all the knowledge is entered by Wolfram's team?
However, the sharing and reuse of this knowledge is a challenge, because usually the knowledge is not semantically organized, and therefore its meaning depends on the understanding of the specialists involved.
This is because the majority of the knowledge is maintained in the employees' heads and when they leave that knowledge walks out with them.
Preconceptionally because the knowledge was far too limited and you would have to be able to reach people at a very early stage …and specifically at that time in the 1990s, the knowledge about inheritable diseases was very limited, both with the older immigrants [those who immigrated to the Netherlands a long time ago], e.g., the people from Surinam, as with more recent immigrants.
The loneliness is the worst, because this knowledge is something that cannot be shared, only suffered.
No nation will willingly transfer its technological know-how to others because that knowledge is the basis of competitive advantage.
Though this method keeps the full system DOFs, the requirement for prior knowledge of the signal of interest (SOI) area limits its effectiveness because the prior knowledge is not easy to be got accurately.
The more we know now, the better, because knowledge is an antidote to the anxiety of change, and more change is the only certainty ahead.
Because of the way knowledge is acquired and the fact that there is more than one appropriate group, we can never know whether space is Euclidean or non-Euclidean, only that we construct it as Euclidean.
That should be understood at the outset, because knowledge is not an American virtue; luck is.
