Because such behaviours are not inherently biological, individual members of such societies acquire these behavioural patterns through the socialization process.
Physicians may feel they have to undertake such coping behaviours to deal with a heavily overcrowded system, and to avoid social judgement, but we argue they may also want to behave in such ways because such behaviours are reinforced by the positive benefits they may obtain.
Furthermore, because the identification of a date or dose associated with the first report of such events could not be reliably captured (because such behaviours are insidious), estimates of time of onset are imprecise and exploration of dose relationships not feasible.
"What employers need to understand," says Kathryn Nawrockyi, gender equality director at BITC, "is that people often don't report these incidents, either because they accept that such behaviour is the norm in their organisation, or because they don't know how to articulate what is happening to them, or because they are afraid – of not being believed, or worse still losing their job".
We do not include a source term for beta-cell replication or neogenesis, because experimental evidence for such behaviour is lacking.
This is not quite so: dissimulation and evasiveness is much more common – in part because being caught out in such behaviour is not fatal to a politician's career.
Such behaviour is alarming precisely because it is bold and, by today's standards, different.
And it seems to me such behaviour is considered blameworthy because it touches on our ancient and persistent conviction that sex in itself is bad unless domesticated by marriage or, at least, by a long-term relationship.
Such behaviour is increasingly rare.
Such behaviour is almost entirely harmless.
