Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(5)
Exact(10)
This may be because our sample is much larger and contains more extremely dusty objects.
Because our sample is just 100 stocks, that is the top 10 and the last 10 stocks.
Finally, because our sample is limited by its high concentration of teachers in the upper elementary grades (3 5), further investigation in the primary grades is warranted.
Unfortunately, this is not possible because our sample is too small.
This could be because our sample is relatively small and has small changes in relative transcript levels.
Because our sample is population-based with no loss to follow-up, selection bias can largely be excluded.
Similar(50)
However, we could not identify special groups because our sample was too small and homogenous.
Therefore, we determined the BCa bootstrap 95%-CI because our sample was small and in this case bootstrap CI were more accurate and correct than the standard CI [29].
We found this required sample from a total of 960 CBCTs (28 CBCTs, 2.94% of prevalence), although this prevalence of impacted canines in the sample did not depict the prevalence in the overall population because our sample was formed by CBCTs of patients that assisted to one radiological images center seeking orthodontic or surgical diagnosis.
This might be because our sample was drawn from only 1 issue, and from only 1 of the 52 Cochrane review groups.
Because our sample was, on average, older than others, we chose to use a more liberal criteria and counted semitone errors as correct for all participants (as in [24], [44]).
More suggestions(18)
because our survey is
because our taste is
because our present is
because our sample has
because our sexuality is
because our motivation is
because our waste is
because our opponent is
because our attention is
because our message is
because our government is
because our house is
because our game is
because our reward is
because our system is
because our future is
because our sample depends
because our apartment is
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com