Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(5)
Exact(5)
However, this finding was expected and consistent because our sample included only patients suffering from chronic pelvic pain.
We could not assess the influence of RF positivity on changes in B-cell subset proportions, because our sample included only four RF-negative patients receiving TNFi.
This may because the power to study miscarriage and preterm births was limited, because our sample included only 13 cases with normal and 20 with abnormal pregnancy.
We used a set of confounders that were very similar to those of Jelliffe-Pawlowski et al., 10 except that we excluded adjustment for ethnicity because our sample included very few women from ethnic minorities.
To test this point, we calculated the S/N ratio as the ratio of the number of spikes in the visual response to spontaneous discharge which was added by 1 [S/N = (visual response)/ spontaneous discharge + 1)] because our sample included neurons without spontaneous discharge (0 spikes/s).
Similar(55)
Therefore, because our sample includes proxy-respondents to enhance generalizability, it was necessary to transform these measures into four sets of binary indicators.
It is possible that this pattern is not apparent in our dataset because our sampling included also freshwater populations as well as coastal populations from White Sea.
Because our samples include very thick layers, with large mismatch porosities between them, the number and length of the etch breaks are important to obtain homogeneous structures.
Second, because our study sample included individuals who received carotid US examination for evaluation of diabetic complications, some characteristics of our sample may be substantially different from those of other samples.
Because our sample set included soil and highly decomposed material, we suspected that a substantial number of sequences would not be represented in the reference Greengenes alignment.
This was possibly because our sample population included patients in whom catheterisation was more difficult than in the previous study's subjects; 33% of our included subjects had an ASA physical status of at least 3.
More suggestions(12)
because our cohort included
because our sample did
because our surveillance included
because our sampling included
because our experiment included
because our enquiry included
because our sample consisted
because our sample had
because our sample was
because our analysis included
because our population included
because our study included
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com