Suggestions(4)
Exact(3)
Furthermore, we did not include reciprocal mating in the QTL model because our previous analysis showed that mating type did not have a significant effect on growth [ 3].
However, this is unlikely to significantly affect the estimates, because our previous analysis of PM air pollution and infant mortality did not find smoking to significantly alter the association between infant mortality and air pollution (Woodruff et al. 1997).
Activation of the Rho1 Rok Myosin-II pathway might also contRho1 Rok Myosin-IIrowth with RasACT, indepathwayly of JNK (Fig. 10), because our previous analysis has shown that JNK activation alone with RasACT does not result in as potent cooperative tumightenesis alsocontribute RhoGEF2 (or Rho1 ACto rok CAtumourqh EE) + Ras ACT (Brumby et al., 2011) (and this study).
Similar(57)
We focused our analysis on the variable consecutive night shift because, in our previous analysis [ 9], the consecutive night shift variable that takes duration into account was the only variable found to be significantly associated with an increased risk of breast cancer.
Because in our previous analysis, none of the IHC-negative cases exhibited gene amplification or high-level polysomy, 8, 10 we regarded 1+ and 2+ as "overexpression," and they were combined as "IHC positive" when scores were categorized into two groups for statistical analysis.
We would prefer to keep our previous analysis because, in our opinion, a 50 ms cut-off will cause an underestimation of the number of connected interneurons.
However, this would be consistent with our previous analysis because we previously reported that preablative sTg level was only dependent on pCND and not on other clinicopathologic variables, and in our cohort, all patients underwent pCND.
We combined Gleason 3+4 and 4+3, because they showed little difference in our previous analysis (Cuzick et al, 2006).
We were also clear that we saw Tesco as the long-term winner and we stand by our previous analysis on its significant underlying economic advantages.
This validates our previous analysis.
This is in agreement with our previous analysis [32].
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com