Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(5)
Exact(11)
These non-parametric tests were chosen because our data did not follow the normal distribution.
We compared open cohorts because our data did not allow identification of individual women.
We did not use Cox's proportional hazards regression analysis because our data did not meet the proportionality assumption.
Secondly, we could not definitively confirm the appropriate use of limited resection, because our data did not include survival data.
Also, because our data did not allow for month resolution of age, we did not include children < 1 year of age.
Second, another selection bias was introduced because our data did not include all 1000 patients who were asked to join this survey and only 67.5% of patients completed the questionnaire.
Similar(49)
At the moment, we cannot verify this explanation because our data do not contain information on separations net of voluntary quits.
We do not want to be penalized because our data do not fit with less complex models drawn from fMRI, EEG.
Because our data do not fit the standard normal distribution (P < 0.05, Kolmogorov Smirnov test), the nonparametric Spearman's rank correlation coefficient was used to assess the correlation.
A limitation to our interpretation is that because our data do not track individual cells over time, we cannot distinguish whether the expression heterogeneity reflects asynchronous fluctuations within individual cells or a wide range of stable microstates.
But, because our data do not show overall group differences in neural activity, we cannot rule out that mean activity in the FFA and LO was unaffected by training.
More suggestions(15)
because our data was
because our probes did
because our peers did
because our variables did
because our brains did
because our maps did
because our data came
because our parents did
because our data included
because our data were
because our friends did
because our experiments did
because our informants did
because our surgeons did
because our samples did
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com