Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(5)
Exact(18)
First, because our analysis was limited to articles in the English language literature, we may have omitted some evidence.
It is difficult to discuss the relationship between the spatial annual pattern of tropospheric gradient found by Yoshida (2010) and the annual pattern of the optimum GRAD parameter identified in the present study, because our analysis was restricted to only two sites due to limitations on computation time.
Third, we calculated only direct costs because our analysis was performed from a payer's perspective.
Because our analysis was restricted to articles in English, it is possible that some studies were missed.
Second, because our analysis was retrospective, unreported factors may have confounded relationships between surgical bleeding consequences, LOS, and costs.
This is because our analysis was based on the proteins predicted from the genome, which are annotated by automated open reading frame detection.
Similar(42)
These results should be applicable under different SNR conditions because our analysis is independent of the noise level.
We did not use protein percent identity because our analysis is nucleotide based.
Because our analysis is mainly descriptive, we believe that little harm was done by using all data.
Moreover, because our analysis is conducted in a gene-by-gene fashion, we may have limited power to detect selection.
Because our analysis is based upon contrasting array data from two DNA pools, the effects of unequal hybridization should largely cancel out [ 15, 18].
More suggestions(17)
because our nanny was
because our sound was
because our idea was
because our visa was
because our team was
because our office was
because our flight was
because our firm was
because our mother was
because our daughter was
because our rent was
because our purse was
because our performance was
because our music was
because our son was
because our identity was
because our defense was
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com