Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(2)
Exact(6)
First of all because I like N. Y.; I like N. Y. because it's there, and I'm here; I like it because one might be able to bury himself in 6 or 7 million people; I like it because the editor has the supreme & typically New Yorkese nerve to ask, and get, $5 for it.
It is not sufficient, because one might be unaware of the objective significance of being a group member.
It is a further claim, because one might be misled by something that is not itself assessable for accuracy: e.g., one might be misled by the car in the driveway into thinking that your neighbor is home.
Thus, two objects that look identical may be susceptible to different standards of judgment, because one might be an artefact (say, a carved stone) and the other not (say, a stone which fell from a cliff and broke, resulting in the same shape as the carved stone).
My point is that the idea of God using natural disasters to reprimand us reminds me of some petulant child who destroys all his toys because one might be broken, leaving a careless, indiscriminate wake of carnage.
But you see, because one might be a wife to the chief - though she may not be pregnant but would nonetheless want to get a share.
Similar(54)
Yes, even after those references I was convinced this one might be admissible because of its confession of a higher power.
With respect to the question of whether my results are indicative of exact counting one might be skeptical because of the strong rank order of position salience.
"The lesson for future politicians," he says, "is to be a little more careful with spending that first trillion, [because] the next one might be a little harder to come by".
If we ignore the fact that the solicitation of prostitution is a crime, there is really no benefit in distinguishing which one might be worse because they are both "very bad".
That's why it's important to know what's on all three of your reports, because one score might be considerably worse than the other two.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com