Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(1)
Exact(1)
As discussed in the accompanying Part I review 6 and elsewhere in the present review, the French RCT should not be pooled in an MA with the other RCTs because of methodological discrepancies.
Similar(56)
Selected studies presented several methodological discrepancies.
Differences could have arisen because of methodological differences.
Histosols were excluded because of methodological differences and data gaps.
Direct comparison with other studies should be done with caution because of methodological differences.
Inconsistent results were found between studies and within analyzed patient cohorts, likely because of methodological shortcomings.
Two studies were excluded because of methodological differences [28], [29].
Because of methodological challenges, vertebral fractures are not extensively studied.
We have imaged the alpha lobes because of methodological reasons.
A number of articles were excluded from this review because of methodological shortcomings.
They excluded most of these candidate studies, however, because of methodological inadequacies.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com