Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(27)
However, while some excellent manual medicine diagnostic studies exist, review articles indicate that findings often vary between studies because of methodological differences, different clinician experiences, lack of examiner training and consensus before the study, lack of concomitant comparisons between symptomatic and asymptomatic subjects, and lack of objective markers [ 7, 16– 16].
This is partly because of methodological differences (e.g. different model specifications, data sources, data coverage, estimation procedures, concepts of operationalization etc).
Direct comparison of this study with ours may not be possible because of methodological differences, such as the different scale of programmes in the two studies.
Our results may differ from those of Roze et al. (2009) because of methodological differences: Our study sample was larger, concentrations were measured at different time points (prenatal vs. postnatal) and in different matrices (maternal serum vs. breast milk) and development was assessed at a younger age using a different instrument.
Changes in plasma renin described previously [ 30] differed from our findings, possibly because of methodological differences, as we did not measure plasma renin activity but plasma renin concentration.
We believe the two feeding experiments differed in the variability of PA feeding response in part because of methodological differences in how we scored parasitism in relation to host feeding behavior.
Similar(33)
The results were further discussed in terms of methodological differences between this and earlier studies.
Do the a priori results hold when controlling for the complete set of methodological differences?
Thus, the variations observed between studies could be the result of methodological differences.
These results were obtained after the adjustment of methodological differences.
The divergent findings could be a result of methodological differences.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com