Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(2)
Exact(4)
Although our cases are heterogeneous, as exemplified by the findings that not all patients with EHS carry HLA-DRB1*1501-DQB1*0602 haplotype, SNP rs5770917 is considered to be a common risk marker for both HLA positive and negative EHS, because no interaction was observed between SNP rs5770917 and HLA-DRB1*1501-DQB1*0602 haplotype.
Because no interaction was found (p=0.12), we analysed men and women together.
Because no interaction was found (P = 0.36), men and women were analyzed together.
Importantly, because no interaction was detected between CSPG4ΔN30-640 and TcdB, the N-terminal region (CSPG4-N30-640) is the only site for TcdB binding.
Similar(56)
Because no interactions were found for diastolic blood pressure, A1C, and cholesterol, we only present the main effects.
We interpret the short-lived, stochastic interactions to be promoter-specific but non-productive RPc and RPo, because no interactions were observed with templates containing a null promoter sequence (at frame rates of 12.5 Hz, Figure 3B) and similar short-lived interactions were observed in the absence of NTPs (single exponential T 0 ∼0.3 s, Figure 3D).
However, these results do not imply that a diabetes intervention is more cost-effective for Asians or Hispanics compared with other races, for men compared with women, or for those of lower income compared with those of middle income, because no interactions were found among any of the three variables for type of diabetes treatment or diabetes-related complications (data not shown).
Because no significant interaction was found, we did not conduct further subgroup analyses.
Because the interaction was nonsignificant (P = 0.87), the daclizumab and no-daclizumab groups were combined in the analyses of exenatide.
Because this interaction was not further characterized, we deleted FUN30 in the orc5-1 mutant background.
All analyses were done for men and women separately because the interaction was significant (p for interaction <0.001).
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com