Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(2)
Exact(1)
Because its proof is similar to Theorem 3.3, we omit the details.
Similar(59)
Well, now I'm more excited about it because now the proof is in the pudding.
Because the proof is rather technical, we divide it into three steps.
Because the proof is similar to that of Lemma 2.2, we omit it.
And so I will assert for you, without proof, because the proof is horribly difficult.
But we still need to work hard because the proof is that we've not been able to keep our clean sheet".
As explained below, see infra this page and 1195-1197, proff of materiality is not required prior to class certification because such proof is not necessary to ensure satisfaction of Rule 23(b)(3)'s predominance requirement.
We omit the details because the proof is direct.
(ii) We state this proof only in outline here because the proof is similar to that of [[3], Theorem 2.1].
We state this proof only in outline here because the proof is similar to that of [[3], Theorem 2.1].
We do not provide a proof of the above proposition because the proof is similar to the converse proof given in Appendix A.2.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com