Apparently this was because in our study several other economically valuable aspects of valuation, other than the medicinal value of myrtle, such as timber production, habitat, regulatory and information functions, were not taken into consideration.
However, the two studies cannot be compared, because in our study meteorologic conditions (e.g., ambient temperature, humidity, rain) were not controlled during the 6 months of the study.
With intraclass analysis, the GO categories of immunity and cell death were not enriched in MMG probably because, in our study, the number of PBL samples available for such analysis was relatively small.
The reason might be because in our study the subjects are older, and the very elderly might have more contact with the health system and so hypertension could be more easily detected and treated.
This is not due to higher physical and functional levels of those who participate in them, because, in our study and others, adjustment for health and function does not change the magnitude of the association of community participation with mortality.
However, this does not mean that BMI is not related to increased health care expenditure through other channels, because in our study individuals with severe and very severe obesity had high direct health care costs, net of the frequent adiposity-related medical conditions.
Furthermore, we believe that targeting Cul4a presents low risk to patient health because, in our studies, Cul4a-deficient mice did not show any adverse phenotypes (which could potentially be explained by CUL4B compensating for the loss of CUL4A).
This intermediate outcome was used in the analysis because patients in our study population have not been followed over a long-enough time period to allow for a more appropriate outcome to be measured.
However, because pianists in our study performed the same tones in parallel with both hands (one octave apart), errors reflecting false memory retrieval should occur in both hands, instead of only in one.
However, we noticed a higher amount of time allocated to sleeping at the expense of foraging, probably because ducks in our study had ad libitum access to food, in a familiar environment.
Because patients in our study were not randomized, we cannot determine causality.
