The phrase 'because he emphasized' is a correct and usable part of a sentence in written English.
You can use it when you want to explain why someone has acted or spoken in a certain way. For example: He loudly repeated the instructions, because he emphasized the importance of following them correctly.
His speech was hailed by gay rights advocates at the time because he emphasized the importance of gender identity.
Still, this was a top Armani Privé show, largely because he emphasized day clothes and tailoring and offered beautiful dresses with spare draping.
Nimbarka's philosophy is known as Bhedabheda because he emphasized both identity and difference of the world and finite souls with brahman.
However, we would all do well to remember the rest of Kennedy's speech that day because he emphasized the task before the nation would not be easy.
Rubio was successful in downplaying his extremist position when speaking to the Latino community because he emphasized his personal story and his parents' pursuit of the American Dream and often avoided the details of what he would actually do to address the 12 million undocumented.
Anthony's definition is important, "because he emphasizes that recovery is a personal journey where people reconfigure and reconstruct their lives.
Mr. Corbett extolled football's "economic engine" and bemoaned the "diminution in value of the Penn State educational and community experience" because it relied, he emphasized, "in part on the prominence of the Penn State football program".
He emphasized the storyline because, as he explains, "the essential quality of the book is an action with a love interest".
Researchers are not formally on strike, he emphasized, because their contracts do not oblige them to teach.
A member of the departing Parliament's security committee, Bahaa al-Araji, pointedly blamed the security forces for unclear loyalties and for "the arrogance" of the generals because of improved security that, he emphasized, the American military had achieved and Iraq's military was squandering.
Rather, he emphasized that because the patent in question was now a widely held technology standard, banning the products in question would be too disruptive to consumers and the economy.
