Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(4)
Exact(1)
The trial ended because data were considered complete.
Similar(59)
Subsequent analyses focused on the 155 kala-azar patients with onset in 2000 or later because these data were considered the most reliable and complete.
The incomplete evacuation question was deleted from the diary and added to the event log because these data were considered to be more accurate if captured at each event.
A correlation was noted between the prescribed effluent flow rate and CLHDF for vancomycin but not for other antibiotics (online supplement Figure S2; see Additional file 1).> -wrap-foot> asignificancesignificance was determined by using the t test because the data were considered normally distributed; the Mann-Whitney test was used for the remaining analyses.
The new developed correlation matched the laboratory data better than other correlations because several log data were considered during the development of this correlation.
The calculation of the immune response index was based on the standard deviation because the healthy control data were considered to reflect a normal distribution.
The average sequence coverage per WGP tag was estimated from the RHPOTKEY BACs only, because their pulsed-field sizing data were considered to be more accurate than the sizing of the RHPOTLUC BACs, and also because this gives a more accurate comparison with the AFLP physical map.
Of these, 126 patients' data were considered non-evaluable because of missing or inconsistent values and then excluded from the data base.
Data were considered observational.
The magnetic local time hours were covered on different days, but because the data being considered cover 2 years, local time seasonal correlation was somewhat smeared out.
That's right none other than the bastion of Internet freedom, the good ole U.S. of A. And China isn't even included on the report, because apparently this data is considered a state secret, not to be published!
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com