Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(5)
Exact(7)
However, because both are based on energy detection, (P_{d_{1}}) and (P_{d_{2}}) are both imperfect when the SNR is relatively low.
Another great resource that takes a similar approach to Friedes' (because both are based on essential management research that began in the 1960s) is Bankable Leadership by Dr. Tasha Eurich.
Both are valid because both are based on truth.
RSD and RBH display a high degree of dependence, despite using slightly different measures of sequence similarity, because both are based on a similar rationale of reciprocally identifying the most similar proteins across two genomes.
This PPR_Mun method is most similar to the official PPR_Phys method, simply because both are based on calculating PPRs.
The Cum10 method provides a result that coincides more with the official method, because both are based on the number of physicians.
Similar(53)
This is not surprising because they both are based on the rate synonymous/non synonymous rate of substitutions that occurred during the evolution of the considered enzymes.
RivalMap reminds me of BaseCamp in part because both products are based on Ruby on Rails and contain many user interface similarities.
Both indices are appealing because they are based on presence/absence data, and unlike many biodiversity measures, neither is affected by the number of species or the sampling effort [30], [32].
I can support both, but I can't believe in either, because my opinions on both issues are based in the facts as I am aware of them, not my faith that they are empirically good policies.
Because they are based on SSS∗ and Dual∗, both dominate Alpha-Beta on a node count basis.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com