Used and loved by millions
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com
bears need for
Grammar usage guide and real-world examplesUSAGE SUMMARY
The phrase "bears need for" is not correct in standard written English.
It is unclear and does not convey a clear meaning, making it difficult to use effectively in communication. Example: "The study shows that bears need for more natural habitats to thrive."
⚠ May contain grammatical issues
News & Media
Science
Wiki
Alternative expressions(1)
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Human-verified examples from authoritative sources
Exact Expressions
2 human-written examples
That's not intended as a knock on Acho; it's more commentary on the Bears' need for an elite talent at a premier position.
News & Media
But unless we halt CO2 concentration rise, years like 2016 are guaranteed to be increasingly frequent, and the average availability of sea ice that bears need for hunting can only decline until it is gone with grave impacts for polar bears.
News & Media
Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources
Similar Expressions
57 human-written examples
Beyond requiring a sea-ice platform for travelling, hunting and feeding, polar bears need the ice for breeding.
News & Media
The bears need sea ice for hunting as they cannot outswim seals, their preferred prey.
News & Media
Polar bears need sea ice for all essential aspects of their lives; so why was this bear swimming here?
News & Media
But they went to the colder eastern coast where there are ice flows the bears need to search for seals.
News & Media
Not everyone from countries ringing the Arctic agrees that the bears need to be singled out for protection in the face of climate change.
News & Media
Bears need the ice to hunt for the enormous amount of food they need to stay alive — some 12,000 calories a day.
News & Media
And the Bears need him".
News & Media
Polar bears need sea ice to survive.
Science & Research
The Bears need an equally spectacular recovery".
News & Media
Expert writing Tips
Best practice
When discussing the needs of bears, specify what they need using clear and grammatically correct phrasing, such as "bears require" or "bears have a need for".
Common error
Avoid using the phrase "bears need for" as it's grammatically incorrect. Instead, rephrase to clearly express what bears require. For example, instead of "bears need for ice", say "bears need ice" or "bears require ice".
Source & Trust
77%
Authority and reliability
1.8/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested
Linguistic Context
The phrase "bears need for" appears to function as a noun phrase that attempts to describe the requirements of bears, although Ludwig AI indicates that it is not grammatically correct. The intended function is to highlight the necessities for bears' survival or well-being.
Frequent in
News & Media
33%
Science
33%
Wiki
33%
Less common in
Formal & Business
0%
Academia
0%
Encyclopedias
0%
Ludwig's WRAP-UP
In summary, the phrase "bears need for" is grammatically incorrect. Ludwig AI marks the phrase as incorrect and suggests alternative phrasings, the most suitable being "bears require" or "bears have a need for". Although found across various contexts like News & Media, Science, and Wiki, its ungrammatical nature detracts from its effectiveness. It's better to use grammatically sound alternatives to clearly communicate the requirements of bears in any context.
More alternative expressions(10)
Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:
bears' necessity for
This alternative replaces "need" with the noun "necessity", adding a possessive form to "bears".
bears' requirement for
Using "requirement" instead of "need" provides a more formal tone.
what bears require for
This version uses "require" as a verb, clarifying the subject and action.
bears' demand for
Replacing "need" with "demand" suggests a stronger sense of necessity.
bears' dependence on
This alternative emphasizes reliance rather than simple need.
bears' reliance on
Similar to "dependence on", this highlights the bears' reliance on something.
bears' essential resources
This phrase focuses on the resources that are essential to bears.
bears' vital requirements
Using "vital requirements" emphasizes the importance of the requirements.
bears' prerequisites
This alternative refers to the prerequisites or preconditions that bears need.
bears' necessities
Focusing on the absolute necessities of bears.
FAQs
How should I correctly express what bears require?
Instead of using the ungrammatical phrase "bears need for", use options such as "bears require", "bears need", or "bears have a need for". For example: "Bears require sea ice for hunting seals."
What are some alternatives to "bears need for" that still convey a sense of necessity?
Alternatives include phrases like "bears' necessity for", "bears' requirement for", or rephrasing the sentence to say "what bears require for". Consider also "bears' dependence on" or "bears' reliance on" if the context involves dependence.
Is "bears need for" grammatically correct?
No, "bears need for" is not grammatically correct. Use more appropriate phrases like "bears need" or "bears require". For example, "Bears need ice to hunt" is correct, while "bears need for ice" is not.
What's the difference between "bears need for" and "bears need"?
"Bears need for" is grammatically incorrect and doesn't clearly convey a complete thought. "Bears need" is grammatically correct and expresses a requirement or necessity. For example, "Bears need sea ice" is correct and understandable.
Editing plus AI, all in one place.
Stop switching between tools. Your AI writing partner for everything—polishing proposals, crafting emails, finding the right tone.
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Source & Trust
77%
Authority and reliability
1.8/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested