Sentence examples for beam distance from inspiring English sources

As baseline, we use a non-coordinative scheduling algorithm called greedy beam distance (GBD) algorithm, with a codebook size of 3 bits (eight beams).

Thereby, a minimum beam distance has to be kept, in order to minimize the interference between users scheduled on the same PRB.

The detected sensitivity distributions shown in Fig. 4 vary with wavelength and fiber to beam distance.

This explains why CREL is less dependent on fiber to beam distance than is CR (see Table 2).

Radiographs of the specimens were obtained with a plain radiograph apparatus (In Vivo DXS 4000 Pro System, Carestream Health, Rochester, NY, USA) at 43 KVP, 2 mA, and 44 cm film-radiation beam distance for a 1.5 s exposure time.

For this reason, the effective sampling depth of CREL for broad beam while fiber to beam distance of 0 mm is about 2 mm larger than that of CR.

The PBD transients measured for different beam distances allow the determination of the diffusion coefficients of the moving ions.

As shown in Fig. 5, while fiber-beam distance changes from 0 to 30 mm, the effective sampling depth varies roughly from 4 to 29 mm for 600-1000 nm wavelength range.

As the fiber-to-beam distance (FBD) varied from 0 to 30 mm, i.e. the distance from the fiber tip to the nearest side of the radiotherapy beam, the effective sampling depth for CR emission changed from 4 to 29 mm for the wavelengths in the range of 600-1000 nm.

To investigate how the detected sensitivity distribution and effective sampling depth are influenced by changes to the arrangement of the radiation beam and the fiber bundle, the electron beam has been shifted further and further away from the fiber tip with fiber-to-beam distance (FBD) of 0 mm, 10 mm, 20 mm and 30 mm.

Using simulations, this study takes an in-depth look at the spatial origins of the CR signal induced by an electron beam and sampled by an optical fiber, with varying fiber-to-beam distances.