Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(1)
Most theorists, he observes, maintain that putative acts of consent are void if it would be wrong to consent to someone's authority.
Similar(59)
Critics say it would be wrong to presume a patient's consent, but education around such a change could give everyone the opportunity to shed donor status and still save lives.
It is generally thought to be wrong to use force against a person without their consent.
Estlund argues on grounds of symmetry that we ought to draw the same conclusion in cases where it would be wrong not to consent to another person's authority.
One way to do so would be to recognize that, since my MLS would really be more like a different person than me, he should be treated as such, i.e., how I treat him should now fall under the rubric of morality, and insofar as it is wrong to harm others without their consent, it would be wrong for me to harm him as well.
The other is as a moral principle according to which (independently of concerns about consent) it is wrong to pay someone to endanger herself.
The Sunday Times was wrong to report last year that he supports reducing the age of consent from 16 to 15, he insists.
I was wrong to worry.
It's wrong to hate.
We were wrong to think.
He is wrong to.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com