Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(3)
This proved to be true for two of three patients".
One of the most important questions at stake is whether it must always be true, for two states of affairs, that things would be better if the first obtained than if the second did, that things would be better if the second obtained than if the first did, or that things would be equally good if either obtained.
If two or more bears of the same species rarely fed in the same transect within the same 3-month time (perhaps because foods were well dispersed on the landscape), then the same would be true for two different species that shared these same foods.
Similar(57)
But it cannot be true (for one of the antecedents is false), and it may be false, in the unlucky event that it turns out that ~A&~B.
The first point is a form of metaethical relativism: It says one morality may be true for one society and a conflicting morality may be true for another society.
We determine a drop of more than 5% by requiring this to be true for four successive data points, and then taking the first of those four points as the point of loss for that stream.
Again, however, this relationship seemed to be true for one virus (SF162), while other viruses did not follow this pattern.
What may be true for one place may not be true for another.
This is true for two main reasons.
"And that's true for two reasons.
This is true for two reasons.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com