Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(5)
Exact(12)
Eliot concurs that in 30 years that may be true "because of uncontrolled health care costs" but today it's the fault of GOP policies on war, taxes and regulation.
And we know this explanation to be true because of something called gravitational lensing.Gravitational lensing is a phenomenon that occurs because gravity, as Einstein showed, bends light.
An argument is deductively valid when the truth of the premises guarantees the truth of the conclusion; i.e., the conclusion must be true, because of the form of the argument, whenever the premises are true.
However, in some cases, it may not be true, because of the particular aggregation of powder particles and the number of powder particles in the dissolved whey.
This may or may not be true because of the heterogeneous nature of the composite (consisting of fibers and matrix and interface), and the significant variability which gives rise to random spatial variation in the properties.
These are proposition-like entities expressed by sentences containing empty names that can fail to be true because of the gaps (see Braun (1993), (2005), Adams et al. (1997)).
Similar(46)
"You're not allowed to use umbrellas, right?" This was true, because of security concerns.
For my part, "fact-checking" borders on tautology, if understood as a demonstration that something is true because of incontrovertible data.
First, Mr. Quine rejected the fundamental distinction between what Kant had called analytic and synthetic propositions, or the distinction between statements that seem true no matter what (like "all bachelors are unmarried") and those that are true because of the way things happen to be (like "Mr. X is a bachelor").
Rather, it is true because of specific phenomenological facts about perceptual experience.
This is true because of the geographical location of Iran, and because 90percentt of Iran is located on faults.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com