Ai Feedback
Exact(8)
Let (tilde{mathcal{R}}= -Delta +W)^{-frac{1}{2}}nabla ) be the adjoint operator of the Riesz transform (mathcal{R}).
Let (A:H rightarrow F) be a bounded linear operator such that (Aneq 0) and let (A^) be the adjoint operator of A. Suppose that (C cap A^{-1}Dneemptyset).
Let (T E rightarrow F) be a bounded linear operator such that (Tneq 0) and let (T^) be the adjoint operator of T. Suppose that (A^{-1}0 cap T^{-1}(B^{-1}0)neemptyset).
Let (T:H rightarrow F) be a bounded linear operator such that (Tneq0) and let (T^) be the adjoint operator of T. Suppose that (A^{-1}0 cap T^{-1}(B^{-1}0) neemptyset).
Now let (A^(t):X^rightarrow X^), where (X^) is the dual of X, be the adjoint operator of (A t)in L X)), (tin I) defined by bigl(A^(t)f bigr) (x)=f bigl(A t)x bigr)quad text{for all } fin {X}^ text{ and } xin{X}.
Let (S_{i}=C_{i}times Q_{i}subseteq H=H_{1}times H_{2}), (i=1,2,ldots,t), (G=[A,-B]:Hmapsto H_{3}), (G^) be the adjoint operator of G, then the original problem (1.3) can be modified as textit{finding }w= x,y inbigcap_{i=1}^{t}S_{i} textit{ which satisfies } Gw=0.
Similar(52)
where ({{boldsymbol {tilde w}}_{boldsymbol {t}}}) is the adjoint operator of w t, and PT T and IPT T are the adjoint operators of PT and IPT, respectively.
(4.10) where (mathcal{L}^{ast}) is the adjoint operator of the operator (mathcal{L}).
The discrete divergence operator div : Y → X is defined by div = − ∇ * (∇ * is the adjoint operator of ∇).
end{aligned} Because K is the adjoint operator, (B^{ast }=B).
where B ∗ is the adjoint operator of B. Lemma 2.1 Suppose that assumptions (A1 - A2) are satisfied.
Related(16)
be the adjoint semigroup
be the Cauchy operator
be the potential operator
be the licensed operator
be the elliptic operator
be the only operator
be the dual operator
be the adjoint set
be the -Laplacian operator
be the differential operator
be the adjoint eigenvector
be the epistemic operator
be the maximal operator
be the identical operator
be the likely operator
be the sole operator
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com