Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(5)
Exact(23)
On Thursday, Oz shared a statement from the BMJ that said the authors of the study were "disappointed that the overwhelming commentary seems to be that our study somehow proves that Dr Oz or The Doctors are quacks or charlatans or worse.
Our inability to validate these associations here may be that our study was underpowered to detect significant associations after adjusting for multiple comparisons; that our study had incomplete gene coverage; or that other genetic mechanisms such as copy number variation influenced the results.
It might be that our study is underpowered in that respect.
Another reason could be that our study is limited to DCs of the medical ICU only.
A possible explanation could be that our study participants demonstrated relatively healthy proprioceptive accuracy.
One possible explanation could be that our study population already exhibited age- and sex-appropriate BP values.
Similar(37)
The reason might be that our studies focused on the gut microbiota during the early period after weaning, whereas their studies investigated the gut microbiota during the period from weaning to adulthood in pigs.
An important difference between that study and ours is that our study was multicentre and that reported by Soubrier and coworkers was a monocentre study.
A fifth limitation was that our study suffers from selection bias.
One potential explanation for this discrepancy is that our study was underpowered to find a statistically significant difference in mRNA.
The second limitation is that our study does not allow understanding the mechanisms of acquisition when cross-transmission was excluded.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com