Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(5)
Exact(5)
Whilst we had more data available to us and used automated tracking methods, it could well be that our method heavily biases walks towards normally distributed reorientation.
Therefore, it could be that our method can correctly classify proteins in the superposed zone between the two distributions, and that some of the predictions tagged as false positives could be in fact prions.
One potential explanation might be that our method was insufficiently sensitive to detect differences in the rates of LTL shortening between smokers and nonsmokers, although the gap in LTL between the 2 groups did increase with age.
Another potential contributing factor to the faster observed rates could be that our method to dissect the RNAP transcription cycle does not require the use of force, or covalent modification of the DNA templates.
However, since titin may contain numerous phosphorylation sites with one or few PKCα dependent sites, it might be that our method is not sensitive enough to resolve the minor relative changes in titin phosphorylation as appeared to be the case for protein kinase G by Krüger et al. [ 21].
Similar(55)
Another interpretation could be that our methods of school categorisation may have blunted any observable effects.
The most important contribution of our study is that our method can be directly applied to commercial machines.
The reason is that our method performs well for both material and object categories, while theirs is good at the material categories but poor at the object categories.
An important note is that our method does not need to directly check the generated rules on the constraints, (L')(supseteq L_0), (R')(supseteq {R}_0).
A possible reason is that our method is conducted in the zero disorder limit, whereas activation studies are performed under the influence of the disorder within the quantum Hall system.
Only thing that can happen in such a case is that our method decides to continue traversing when it does not need to.
More suggestions(15)
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com