Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(1)
Demographic, clinical and biochemical study variables will be summarized using number (percentage) and measures of location and dispersion as appropriate.
Similar(59)
Categorical data are summarized using number (percentage), and were compared using the chi-square or Fisher's exact test.
Continuous variables related to these safety assessments were summarized using the number of observations, mean, SD, minimum, median, and maximum values, while categorical (nominal) variables were summarized using number of observations and percentages.
Categorical data were summarized using numbers or percentages.
Descriptive data were summarized using numbers and percentages; continuous data were summarized using means and standard deviations (SD, or ranges).
Flickering frequencies obtained here could be summarized using Strouhal number and Froude number, and in a relation of St ∝ Fr-0.57.
The following baseline characteristics will be summarized using descriptive statistics: number of patients, gender, age, affected side, duration of symptoms (months), prior ankle surgery, body mass index (kg/m), trauma, smoking, size of lesion (mm), classification, duration of PEMF- or sham-treatment (hours), AAS, NRS pain, FAOS, AOFAS-AHS, and EQ-5D.
Continuous variables will be summarized using descriptive statistics, i.e., number of patients with available data (N), mean, median, standard deviation (S.D ., 25 75 % quartile (Q1-Q3), minimum, and maximum.
Continuous variables will be summarized using descriptive statistics, i.e. number of patients with available data (n), mean, median, standard deviation (SD), 25 %-75 % quartile (Q1-Q3), minimum, and maximum.
Continuous variables were summarized using the number of observations (n), mean, standard deviation (SD), median, minimum, and maximum.
Categorical variables and ordinal variables were summarized using the number (percent) in various categories.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com