Sentence examples for be substantial grounds for from inspiring English sources

It charged that he failed to comply with the Committee's subpoenas, even though they called for information that was needed to resolve "fundamental, factual questions relating to Presidential direction, knowledge or approval of actions demonstrated by other evidence to be substantial grounds for impeachment of the President".

District judge John Zani said there were "substantial grounds" for believing Arronategui would not voluntarily return to custody and no application for bail was made.

These laws also prohibit the U.S. government from extraditing non-nationals to third countries where there are "substantial grounds for believing" that they would be tortured.

The last of them almost certainly violates the Convention's ban on sending anyone to a country "where there are substantial grounds for believing that he would be in danger of being subjected to torture".

It says member states may not transfer asylum seekers when there are "substantial grounds for believing that the asylum seeker would face a real risk of being subjected to inhuman or degrading treatment".

The international Convention Against Torture, which the United States has signed, prohibits the transfer of a detainee "to another state where there are substantial grounds for believing that he would be in danger of being subjected to torture".

The United Nations Convention Against Torture prohibits the transfer of a detained person to the custody of a state where there are substantial grounds for believing that the detainee is at risk of torture.

The United Nations Convention Against Torture prohibits the transfer of a detained person to the custody of another state where there are substantial grounds for believing that the detainee is at risk of torture.

In 1998, Congress passed legislation declaring that it is "the policy of the United States not to expel, extradite, or otherwise effect the involuntary return of any person to a country in which there are substantial grounds for believing the person would be in danger of being subjected to torture, regardless of whether the person is physically present in the United States".

According to United Nations documents provided to The New York Times, the United Nations Office of Legal Affairs wrote to the head of the peacekeeping department in April and said that peacekeepers "cannot participate in any form of joint operation" with the Congolese Army, "if there are substantial grounds for believing there to be a real risk of them violating international humanitarian law".

The decision of the Grand Chamber in Chahal reflects article three of the UN Torture Convention (ratified by the Thatcher government in 1988) preventing the UK from expelling, returning or extraditing a person to another state where there are substantial grounds for believing that he would be in danger of being subjected to torture.