Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(3)
Exact(1)
It could be seen that use of this ambiguous language means that results are being presented cautiously but it could also have the effect of creating doubt or suggest an unwillingness or inability to have an opinion either way.
Similar(59)
It can be seen that using BPSK, a BER about is reached at SNR of 25 dB per antenna.
For the first model, it can be seen that using more than 4,096 particles slightly improves the quality of estimation.
It can be seen that using SAFARI in Figure 7, some routers are used rarely, especially the ones far away from gateways.
Results are shown in Fig. 10 and it can be seen that using the liquid crystal shifts the peak wavelength to longer values and broadens the spectra.
According to the results in Fig. 10, it can be seen that using PID controller in wind turbine system is not appropriate by considering uncertainties.
It can be seen that using a small source block size provides shorter download times irrespective of the MCS mode and multicast data rate.
It can be seen that using 'What reactions were involved in the experiment?' did not result in the capture of reaction scheme or RMMs in the Profile Template condition.
The stationarity parameters tend to infinity in the case of WSSUS for which {Δτ rms, Δs rms }→ 0. It can also be seen that using this approach, different values of Ts can be obtained from a single wideband channel realization for different values of frequencies.
It can be seen that using the SDGN model, we can get a gain of 6 dB at λ = 0 dB and 3 dB at λ = 10 dB under the scintillation effect, whereas we can get 2.5 dB to 1 dB without scintillation effect at a BER of 10-3.
It can be seen that (using a fluorescence microscope with a 100× magnification objective) the mean number of foci observed in the three cell lines following exposure to 2 Gy gamma radiation is higher than that observed using the ImagestreamX.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com