As can be seen from formulas (11), (12), and (13), after triangular decomposition, the power that is sent by the BS in cell 3 does not leak to other cells, namely, result in no interferences to other cells.
As is seen from formula (10), with increasing semiaxes the particle energy is lowered.
As is seen from formula (10), the energy spectrum of CCs in SPEQD is equidistant.
As can be seen from the formula, there are three situations in terms of the difference between window w and t-t0. 1) t-t0 ≥ w, in this situation, the calculation is the same as Equation 2. 2) 0 < t-t0 < 1, the time difference between the current time and t0 is less than 1 s.
As can be seen from the formula, there are three situations in terms of the difference between t - t0 and window w. (1) 0 < t - t0 < 1, in this case, the packet delivery rate is the number of Hello packets received from t0 to t. (2) 1 ≤ t - t0 < w, the packet delivery probability in this condition is the number of Hello packets received from t0 to t divided by the length of this period.
(Note that Furry and Hurwitz speak of the normal distribution, in fact they investigated the half-normal, as can be seen from their formula (a) on p.53.
This can also be seen from the formula for the accuracy of GBLUP, as shown by [ 17] and [ 18], which depends on the number of independent segments in the genome, but not on the actual number of QTL.
As can be seen from the formulas listed above, when |θ| = 30°, C 2 and C 3 are infinite values, resulting in the singularity of numerical calculation, and therefore, in the UMAT they are set to be zero when |θ| is greater than the transition angle θ T.
In this case it can be seen from the formulas mentioned above that each μ outside the interval [ μ 1 ∗ ; μ 2 ∗ ] leads to a significant treatment effect, if and only if (8) n − 2 (s Y 1 s Y 2 − r Y 1 Y 2 ) 1 − r Y 1 Y 2 2 > t n − 2 ; 1 − α / 2 This is usually true for large n.
