Sentence examples for be said to differ from inspiring English sources

Controversy exists over whether children can be said to differ in a unitary abstract ability called intelligence or whether each child might better be described as possessing a set of specific cognitive abilities.

In or around 1917, the Missouri Board of Pharmacy wrote that: A metal may be said to differ from a metalloid [that is, a nonmetal] in being an excellent conductor of heat and electricity, in reflecting light more or less powerfully and in being electropositive.

However, this explanation does not hold true for the assessment of 'recurrent falls', where the rates cannot be said to differ between assessment methods.

Vectors with a Hamming of 1 are said to differ by a single-bit flip.

Evaluative learning is said to differ from Pavlovian associative learning in that it reflects stimulus contiguity, not contingency.

Time is said to differ from space, and thus not be identical with it, in the following respect: whereas what is spatially near or far varies from person to person, what is temporally near or far is the same for all persons (cf. Bhaduri 1947, Mohanty 1992).

The calls were said to differ between sexes, though there are no details.

This depiction was said to differ from the image Mexico's Ministry of the Interior sought to present of Calderón, whom they dubbed the "Employment president".

Although the period of Schelling's 'identity philosophy' is usually dated from the 1801 Presentation of My System of Philosophy until sometime before the 1809 On the Essence of Human Freedom, the project of that philosophy can be said to be carried on in differing ways throughout his work.

The metaphor of a chain, however, provides no real answer to the problem raised by Bradley, especially so in light of the fact that it is all but clear that Wittgenstein's logico-ontological atoms can be said to possess a form; surely, they differ from Democritean atoms in that they lack material properties (cf. 2.0331 and 2.0232).

On the basis of Luce's (2002, 2004) theory's holding for loudness, they successfully evaluated the resulting axioms for loudness, and the result was that the scales are the same as long as different reference points for increasing and decreasing intensities are allowed to differ; thus, individuals can be said to rely on a single scale of loudness.