Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(5)
Exact(6)
Umps should always be right, even when they aren't.
It's the same mechanism that makes people argue to be right even when they know they're wrong.
He also leads on "does what he believes to be right, even when those decisions are unpopular".
Our claim is that both measures can, in fact, be right even when they reach opposite conclusions.
In such a study, which measure should be used if they happen to disagree about which of two conditions yields higher discriminability, a model-based theoretical measure like d' or a model-free empirical measure like AUC? Could both measures be right even when they reach opposite conclusions?
Even worse, your accuser might be right, even when your heart was in the right place.
Similar(54)
In his 2007 self-published book, "Pleased, But Not Satisfied," Mr. Sokol, wrote: "Integrity is merely doing what is right, even when no one else is looking.
A. Moral courage is standing up publicly for what you believe is right even when others — including sometimes your friends and teammates — don't.
"As the women of Dagenham showed us, It's so important to fight for what you believe is right, even when it's scary".
When Nhu is being strong and certain that she's right, even when she may not be, it's better not to directly oppose that and use more subtle ways to make your point, though it doesn't always work.
Historians these days seek to understand how predecessors thought they were right even when we know they weren't, but some retain the privilege of judging those who were hubristically wrong, who ignored evidence that was then available.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com