Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSimilar(60)
The study of McLaughin et al. (2006) shows no difference between obese and non-obese with regard to the long term outcome, however in both groups more than 55% were revised for loosening at the time of analysis.
Further analysis showed that of the 42 cases that had lateral release, 18 (46 %) were revised for infection.
No knee was revised for polyethylene wear.
Officials figures also were revised for March.
None of the knees was revised for patellofemoral problems.
Two HG cups were revised for augmented polyethylene wear.
No stems were revised for aseptic loosening or osteolysis.
This post has been revised for clarity.
Patient and therapist manuals are being revised for publication.
This article was revised for the Huffington Post.
Two patients who were revised for acetabular complications in the immediate post-operative period (one loose cup that were revised the same day, and one loose cup revised for an intra-operative acetabular fracture) were excluded from the failure analysis.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com