Used and loved by millions

Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak quote

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak

CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com

MitStanfordHarvardAustralian Nationa UniversityNanyangOxford

be reviewed for

Grammar usage guide and real-world examples

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "be reviewed for" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when indicating that something is to be examined or evaluated for a specific purpose or criteria. Example: "The proposal will be reviewed for compliance with the new regulations."

✓ Grammatically correct

Academia

News & Media

Science

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

The worksheet will be reviewed for approval.

It will be reviewed for final approval in December.

News & Media

The New York Times

The ballots may then be reviewed for accuracy.

News & Media

The New York Times

It will be reviewed for final approval this December.

News & Media

The New York Times

All applications will be reviewed for consideration of an interview.

In other words, he'll be reviewed for his advance first and his storytelling second.

Larry Bucshon asks if the algorithms are publicly available to be reviewed for bias.

Papers will be reviewed for their suitability, rigor of analysis, and contribution.

All material in ACLU Subgroup 4 must be reviewed for legal restrictions prior to research use.

Abstracts will be reviewed for completeness and to ensure psychometric adequacy.

The request will be reviewed for eligibility and the author informed whether it has been approved.

Show more...

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "be reviewed for", ensure the context clearly specifies the criteria or aspects being evaluated. For example, "The manuscript will be reviewed for clarity and originality."

Common error

Avoid using "be reviewed for" without specifying what aspects are being assessed. For example, instead of saying "The application will be reviewed", specify "The application will be reviewed for completeness and accuracy."

Antonio Rotolo, PhD - Digital Humanist | Computational Linguist | CEO @Ludwig.guru

Antonio Rotolo, PhD

Digital Humanist | Computational Linguist | CEO @Ludwig.guru

Source & Trust

86%

Authority and reliability

4.5/5

Expert rating

Real-world application tested

Linguistic Context

The phrase "be reviewed for" functions as a passive construction indicating that a subject will undergo a process of examination or evaluation. As Ludwig AI underlines, its usage is grammatically sound. Examples include "Abstracts will be reviewed for completeness" and "Applications will be reviewed for consideration of an interview."

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

Academia

43%

News & Media

35%

Science

19%

Less common in

Formal & Business

2%

Wiki

1%

Reference

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "be reviewed for" is a grammatically correct and frequently used expression to indicate that something will undergo examination or evaluation based on specific criteria. As Ludwig AI states, it's a correct phrase. Predominantly found in academic, news, and scientific contexts, it maintains a neutral to professional register. When using this phrase, ensure that the evaluation criteria are clearly defined to avoid ambiguity. Related phrases include "be evaluated for" and "be assessed for", each with slightly different connotations.

FAQs

How can I use "be reviewed for" in a sentence?

You can use "be reviewed for" to indicate that something will be examined or assessed according to specific criteria. For example, "The project proposal will be reviewed for feasibility and cost-effectiveness".

What are some alternatives to "be reviewed for"?

Alternatives include "be evaluated for", "be assessed for", or "be examined for", each implying a slightly different nuance of examination or assessment.

Which is correct, "be reviewed for" or "be review for"?

"Be reviewed for" is the correct and grammatically sound phrase. "Be review for" is missing the past participle form of the verb "review" and is therefore incorrect.

What's the difference between "be reviewed for" and "be considered for"?

"Be reviewed for" implies a detailed examination based on specific criteria, while "be considered for" suggests something is being taken into account as a possibility or option, without necessarily involving a thorough review process.

ChatGPT power + Grammarly precisionChatGPT power + Grammarly precision
ChatGPT + Grammarly

Editing plus AI, all in one place.

Stop switching between tools. Your AI writing partner for everything—polishing proposals, crafting emails, finding the right tone.

Source & Trust

86%

Authority and reliability

4.5/5

Expert rating

Real-world application tested

Most frequent sentences: