Basal-like tumors can be reliably defined by immunohistochemistry (ER-, PR- and HER2-negative; triple negative).
However, the risk of individual second primary cancers cannot be reliably assessed due to a limited number of patients.
Chronic and recurrent depression could not be reliably distinguished due to non-contiguous periods of assessment.
Parallel analyses for social workers could not be reliably estimated due to the small group size.
EMG reaction times for individual trials could not be reliably determined due to a poorer signal to noise ratio, partly due to resting EMG activity due to rigidity.
The relative abundances cannot be reliably compared due to differences in the methodologies, and growth phases of cells.
In two cases cfPWV could not be reliably measured due to atrial fibrillation and impalpable femoral pulse.
Note that the KD for F366A could not be reliably measured due to the low heat associated with binding.
Changes in planned referral to an audiologist or otolaryngologist could not be reliably assessed due to small numbers.
The linearity of these curves could not be reliably established due to the small number of samples.
