Sentence examples for be relevant when comparing from inspiring English sources

This generally accepted interpretation, however, has at least three caveats that may be relevant when comparing GWAS findings to linkage meta-analysis.

This test's appeal is that many of the concerns about unobserved differences in determinants of infant health are much less likely to be relevant when comparing siblings that share the same mother.

Because of the well-documented differences in ingesta retention times between herbivorous reptiles (230±140 h [17], [46]) and mammals (40±25 h [16]), the similarity in methane scaling between reptiles and mammals also indicates that retention time as such is not the main factor influencing the scope of methane production, even if it may be relevant when comparing data within species [47], [48].

This may be relevant when comparing patients without complications, but complication related costs highly exceed those of monitoring and GDT has been proven to reduce complications.

The fact that altered peripheral glucose homeostasis was detected in both mouse models exhibiting progressive Aβ accumulation in the brain underscores the notion that our observations in the acute model consisting of brain infusion of AβOs are relevant when compared to clinical observations in early AD patients (Craft et al, 1992).

In terms of generalizability, there was consensus on the items that are relevant when comparing revision rates between studies, although in round 3 most of the included postoperative functioning items only just reached the cut off point of two thirds, see Additional File 2. However, the preference for the mode values (e.g. 5 years) was mostly moderate and even low for some items.

Having only a control group exposed to 20% oxygen, which although a standard culture condition, is actually hyperoxic, and comparing this to a low oxygen tension, such as 2%, is only relevant when comparing results with the literature and makes data much more difficult to interpret and relate to the in vivo situation.

This is especially relevant when comparing a novel nanoparticle-based drug with conventional formulations, and when evaluating a generic version of an approved nanomedicine versus the innovator product.

This is particularly relevant when comparing gene expression profiles in complex tissue with multiple, phenotypically distinct cell types, within a given tumour or between normal and cancer tissue where phenotypically normal cells adjacent to a tumour may exhibit altered gene expression profiles owing to their proximity to the tumour [ 32, 105].

For a POC instrument to be useful, it should be sensitive enough to indicate such alterations in hemostasis in a timely fashion, and the data from 1 hr postoperatively may be the most relevant when comparing the instruments.

However changes in cardiopulmonary function were not as relevant when comparing between groups.