Used and loved by millions
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com
be regarded to
Grammar usage guide and real-world examplesUSAGE SUMMARY
The phrase "be regarded to" is not correct in English.
The correct expression is "be regarded as." Example: "He is often regarded as a leading expert in his field."
⚠ May contain grammatical issues
Science
News & Media
Encyclopedias
Alternative expressions(20)
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Human-verified examples from authoritative sources
Exact Expressions
60 human-written examples
These individuals cannot be regarded to represent science in Korea.
News & Media
Remarkably, the point of contact may always be regarded to be instantaneously at rest.
Encyclopedias
There is great selflessness and valor in the military, but there is heroism, too, in running mentoring programs and getting kids through school — becoming part of their families in a way that can also be regarded, to borrow Kelly's word, as sacred.
News & Media
These load variations can be regarded to follow Gaussian distribution.
Generally, the speckle and texture components can be regarded to be statistically independent.
Due to high SCR, the target data can be regarded to be free of clutter.
Technically, a principal component can be regarded to be a linear combination of optimally weighted observed variables [15].
It is demonstrated that the crack propagation rate can be regarded to consist of two components: a time-dependent creep component, and a frequency dependent cyclic component.
Hence, these tests may be regarded to be confirmatory tests to structural behavior of Q690 steel welded H-sections under combined compression and bending.
Manganese-based perovskites can be regarded to be sufficiently stable, while for the better performing LSCF cathodes some intrinsic degradation was detected.
Science
The results show that FSI effect could not be regarded to decrease the seismic response simply but it should be considered in structure design and analysis.
Science
Expert writing Tips
Best practice
Always use "be regarded as" instead of "be regarded to". The correct preposition is "as", not "to".
Common error
A common mistake is using "to" instead of "as" after "be regarded". This is grammatically incorrect. Always double-check the preposition following "be regarded" to ensure it is "as".
Source & Trust
83%
Authority and reliability
2.1/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested
Linguistic Context
The phrase "be regarded to" functions as a passive construction where something is being assessed or viewed in a particular way. However, it is grammatically incorrect, as demonstrated by Ludwig, and should be replaced with "be regarded as".
Frequent in
Science
84%
News & Media
13%
Encyclopedias
1%
Less common in
Formal & Business
0%
Reference
0%
Wiki
0%
Ludwig's WRAP-UP
The phrase "be regarded to" is grammatically incorrect and should be avoided in formal writing. The correct form, as Ludwig AI reports, is "be regarded as". Although "be regarded to" appears in various contexts, including scientific and news sources, its incorrectness undermines its effectiveness in conveying its intended purpose of expressing an opinion or assessment. It's crucial to use "be regarded as" or similar alternatives like "be considered as" to maintain grammatical accuracy and clarity. By avoiding this error, writers can ensure their message is conveyed effectively and professionally.
More alternative expressions(10)
Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:
be considered as
This alternative replace 'regarded' with 'considered' and fixes the incorrect preposition 'to' with 'as'.
be viewed as
This alternative replace 'regarded' with 'viewed' and fixes the incorrect preposition 'to' with 'as'.
be deemed to be
This alternative replace 'regarded' with 'deemed' and does not require a preposition.
be seen as
This alternative replace 'regarded' with 'seen' and fixes the incorrect preposition 'to' with 'as'.
be perceived as
This alternative replace 'regarded' with 'perceived' and fixes the incorrect preposition 'to' with 'as'.
be recognized as
This alternative replace 'regarded' with 'recognized' and fixes the incorrect preposition 'to' with 'as'.
be known as
This alternative replace 'regarded' with 'known' and fixes the incorrect preposition 'to' with 'as'.
be understood as
This alternative replace 'regarded' with 'understood' and fixes the incorrect preposition 'to' with 'as'.
be interpreted as
This alternative replace 'regarded' with 'interpreted' and fixes the incorrect preposition 'to' with 'as'.
be characterized as
This alternative replace 'regarded' with 'characterized' and fixes the incorrect preposition 'to' with 'as'.
FAQs
What is the correct way to use the phrase?
The correct form is "be regarded as", not "be regarded to". For example, "He is "regarded as" an expert" is correct.
Are there alternatives to "be regarded as"?
Yes, you can use phrases like "be considered as", "be viewed as", or "be deemed to be" depending on the context.
Why is "be regarded to" considered grammatically incorrect?
The phrase "be regarded to" is grammatically incorrect because the correct preposition to use after "regarded" in this context is "as". The phrase requires "as" to properly link the subject and its description.
In what contexts might I encounter "be regarded to", and should I use it?
While you might find "be regarded to" in some texts, especially in scientific papers, it is generally considered incorrect. You should always use "be regarded as" instead.
Editing plus AI, all in one place.
Stop switching between tools. Your AI writing partner for everything—polishing proposals, crafting emails, finding the right tone.
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Source & Trust
83%
Authority and reliability
2.1/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested