Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(5)
Exact(7)
Theorem 2.3 can be proven by using the ideas in the proof of [30], Theorem 2.
Theorem 2.2 can be proven by using the ideas presented in the proof of [28], Theorem 3.3.
Proof We see that this result can be proven by using a similar method to Theorem 3.1.
However, the third property of the original objective function still holds, i.e., the objective function in (15) provides shortest paths in terms of hop distances satisfying both the transmission rate and QoS requirement of each sublayer, which can be proven by using the similar approach to the third property of Theorem 1.
However, Patel and Rao [ 30] reasoned that the lack of activity can be proven by using large doses.
This can also be proven by using the mathematical induction as described for single protein ligands in Conzelmann et al. [ 16] (data not shown).
Similar(53)
It can be proved by using contraction.
This can be proved by using (1.2) and (3.1).
This can be proved by using the techniques similar to those used in Theorem 2.2.
The second part can be proved by using similar arguments and using (1.9).
This can be proved by using (5.1 - 5.4 5.1 - 5.4dopting the anduments in Remark 3.2.
More suggestions(17)
be revealed by using
be reported by using
be perceived by using
be confirmed by using
be substantiated by using
be provided by using
be verified by using
be corroborated by using
be prepared by using
be viewed by using
be fulfilled by using
be developed by using
be identified by using
be performed by using
be sensed by using
be acquired by using
be proven by showing
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com