Suggestions(2)
Exact(1)
Results will be presented using risk ratios with 95% CI for dichotomous outcomes and standardised mean differences with 95% CI for continuous outcomes.
Similar(59)
The results will be presented using relative measures including relative risk (RR) and relative risk reduction (RRR), and absolute risk reduction (ARR), with 95% confidence intervals.
Results were presented using relative risk (RR) for categorical data and weighted mean difference (WMD) for continuous data.
Finally, the results of this meta-analysis were presented using the relative risk scale, which is less easy to translate to practice and more challenging for clinicians to understand.
The observational data in this study were presented using univariate, unadjusted and risk-adjusted multivariate models.
Rates were presented using the exact time at risk for over 350,000 dogs contributing to over a million dog-years at risk (DYAR) during six years for total mortality (all deaths), diagnostic mortality (those deaths for which an insurance claim was processed), for deaths within various diagnostic categories and for some specific diagnoses.
The health risk survey was presented using Digivey Survey Suite software (CREOSO Digivey Survey Centre, Arizona, USA).
Risk information was presented using natural frequencies, visual displays, and a range of formats.
The task was presented using PsyScope 1.2.5 [27].
The final model was presented using REML.
In addition, the impact of risk factors (how much disease burden is caused by certain risk factors) was also presented using the population attributable risk percent (PAR%) with 95% confidence interval in certain conditions.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com