Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(5)
"be of poor quality" is a correct and usable phrase in written English.
It is commonly used when describing something that is not of good quality or is low in quality. Example: The clothes at the discount store were of poor quality, with loose threads and cheap fabric.
Exact(60)
Only 2% of locations surveyed were found to be of poor quality.
However, the internet is unregulated and information can be of poor quality.
Basic life support (BLS) by doctors has been shown to be of poor quality.
When the tape turned out to be of poor quality, she spent another hour redelivering the talk.
However, vaccine coverage estimates in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) have repeatedly been shown to be of poor quality.
Addressing concerns that the lines may be of poor quality, Mr. Thompson declared: "They're diverse, they're robust, they're viable for research".
Lipton said the rapid rise in lending increased the risk that some investments might be of poor quality and borrowers might default.
They stop chicken portions from being dispatched when the packaging is damaged or the meat looks to be of poor quality.
The positive effect on parasitism rate was significant but weak, as floral nectar of mustard is known to be of poor quality for parasitoids.
Following consistency tests, 23 data sets were found to be of good quality and 11 data sets were found to be of poor quality.
A De Beers subsidiary held the exploitation rights to the fields but let them expire in 2006 because, according to industry sources, it believed the diamonds to be of poor quality.
More suggestions(17)
be of bad quality
be of weak quality
be of low quality
be of poor quality quality
proved of poor quality
be of poor background
be of superior quality
be of poor quantification
be of poor construction
be of strong quality
be of high quality
be of poor interest
be of sound quality
be of satisfactory quality
be of exceptional quality
be of inferior quality
be of appropriate quality
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com