Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(1)
As no head-to-head studies of the WatchBP Home A (or equivalent device) and pulse palpation were identified, the EAC made an indirect comparison using data derived from the SAFE (Screening for Atrial Fibrillation in the Elderly) study [ 16], which was considered to be of highest methodological quality and have greatest external validity.
Similar(59)
These studies are designed to rigorously synthesize scientific literature; however, cannot be assumed to be of high methodological quality.
†Trials considered to be of high methodological quality.
In general, trials were considered to be of high methodological quality.
Future economic evaluations of DM programs should target a wider population of COPD-patients and be of higher methodological quality.
1 5 12 20 23 25 Overall, we considered five trials to be of high methodological quality, 1 5 12 20 23 with a low risk of bias.
On the other hand, future studies need to be of higher methodological quality and particularly use validated tools.
Five trials were considered to be of high methodological quality (low risk of bias), whereas the rest were low quality (high or unclear risk of bias).
The authors judged nine studies to be of high methodological quality, four studies to be high/moderate quality, with the remaining 17 studies being of lower quality.
These databases are sources of systematic reviews that tend to be of higher methodological quality, which may reflect better reporting and hence better indexing.
Only four out of 35 studies were found to be of high methodological quality according to a self-developed rating system.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com