Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(5)
Exact(12)
These studies are designed to rigorously synthesize scientific literature; however, cannot be assumed to be of high methodological quality.
†Trials considered to be of high methodological quality.
In general, trials were considered to be of high methodological quality.
Only four out of 35 studies were found to be of high methodological quality according to a self-developed rating system.
The authors judged nine studies to be of high methodological quality, four studies to be high/moderate quality, with the remaining 17 studies being of lower quality.
Five trials were considered to be of high methodological quality (low risk of bias), whereas the rest were low quality (high or unclear risk of bias).
Similar(48)
Future economic evaluations of DM programs should target a wider population of COPD-patients and be of higher methodological quality.
On the other hand, future studies need to be of higher methodological quality and particularly use validated tools.
These databases are sources of systematic reviews that tend to be of higher methodological quality, which may reflect better reporting and hence better indexing.
There are currently more than 3,000 Cochrane reviews and they have been shown to be of higher methodological quality, on average, than other systematic reviews [ 14, 15].
Given the evidence that Cochrane reviews tend to be of higher methodological quality compared with other reviews, 7 8 our secondary objective was to investigate differences in findings between Cochrane and non-Cochrane reviews.
More suggestions(18)
be of high systematic
be of moderate methodological
be of insufficient methodological
be of 'high methodological
be of sufficient methodological
be of 'good methodological
be of good methodological
be of adequate methodological
be of 'sufficient methodological
be of high electrical
be of high diagnostic
be of high therapeutic
be of high practical
be of strong methodological
be of low methodological
be of high artistic
be of poor methodological
be of high literary
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com