Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(4)
Exact(9)
As with replanning algorithms, AD* can be much more computationally expensive than planning from scratch.
Also, the simplified algorithm is found to be much more computationally efficient than the iterative technique.
The proposed approach proves to be much more computationally efficient than those other methods.
The time-domain formulation shows to be much more computationally efficient and robust with reference to truncation errors.
This method is proven to be much more computationally efficient than the classical DEM FEM or FEM2 approach while at the same time more robust and flexible than the classical surrogate modeling approach.
This would be much more computationally demanding than clustering on the reduced rank X-scores.
Similar(51)
On the other hand, the quantum methods are much more computationally intensive than molecular mechanics.
First, feature-vector-based matching costs are much more computationally intensive than pixel-intensity-based ones.
It can also be concluded through these comparisons that the '2.5D FEM + 2.5D BEM' is much more computationally efficient.
Our second method is much more computationally intense, but preserves the exact structure of the sequence of preceding ISIs.
We have now replaced the integral in the second term by a sum, which is much more computationally tractable.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com