be merged by a

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "be merged by a" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used in contexts where you are describing the action of combining or integrating something by a specific agent or process. Example: "The two datasets will be merged by a sophisticated algorithm to ensure accuracy."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Science

Encyclopedias

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

1 human-written examples

The blueprint was the basis for the legislation approved by the House and Senate, which is about to be merged by a conference committee.

The New York Times

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

58 human-written examples

But father and son are merged by a process of epic fusion, so that Wolfdietrich appears to be the counterpart sometimes of Theodoric and sometimes of Theodebert.

Encyclopedia Britannica

About half of the group's eight core recommendations -- though not the pay proposal -- are strongly reflected in the two bills that are now being merged by a conference committee.

The New York Times

Data from different sources were merged by a non-investigator data manager (such as, an honest broker) and were stripped of all identifying information to preserve patient anonymity and to comply with local and federal regulations.

Critical Care

The divisions were merged by an act of the legislature last summer.

The New York Times

The surface low pressure area crossed into north Texas before dissipating early on August 12, while its upper-level circulation turned northward into Oklahoma before being merged by an approaching trough.

Wikipedia

The outputs from these databases were merged by an own program written in C++ program language.

BMC Medical Genomics

This resulted in an awkward scenario – while Shelfari and LibraryThing are similar and could conceivably be merged by Amazon pending a dual aquision, there is bad blood between them.

TechCrunch

The combined algorithmic and blocklist anti-tracking approaches will be merged by Cliqz into a new tech that will be implemented across both Ghostery-branded and Cliqz-branded products.

TechCrunch

Since the dimensions of the nanostructure are much smaller than the wavelength of light, the optical properties of the nanowires and the embedding matrix can be merged by means of an effective medium approximation (EMA) [18].

Nanoscale Research Letters

To resolve any contradictions, the normalized attributes can be merged by proper merging rules, like an additive form, a multiplicative form, and a distance form corresponding to different relationships between parameters.

Journal of Modern Power Systems and Clean Energy

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Use "be merged by a" when you want to emphasize the process or agent that is causing the merging, rather than just stating that something is merged.

Common error

Avoid using "be merged by a" in active voice constructions; it's inherently passive. For example, don't write "The algorithm will be merged the datasets", instead use "The algorithm will merge the datasets" or "The datasets will be merged by the algorithm".

Linguistic Context

The phrase "be merged by a" functions as a passive construction, indicating that something is undergoing the action of being combined or integrated. Ludwig shows examples where this construction is used to describe data being combined or legislative bills being consolidated.

Expression frequency: Rare

Frequent in

Science

34%

News & Media

33%

Encyclopedias

33%

Less common in

Formal & Business

0%

Wiki

0%

Reference

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "be merged by a" is a grammatically correct passive construction used to describe the combination or integration of entities, highlighting the agent or process responsible. As Ludwig AI confirms, it's best employed in contexts where the merging action or its facilitator is more important than the subject being merged. While relatively rare, it appears in various sources including scientific and news media. Related phrases include "be combined by a" and "be integrated by a". Be mindful of maintaining a passive voice and avoiding active voice misconstructions to ensure proper usage.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

be combined by a

This alternative replaces "merged" with "combined", indicating a simpler form of uniting elements.

be integrated by a

This alternative suggests a deeper level of unification, where elements become an intrinsic part of a whole.

be consolidated by a

This alternative implies strengthening or reinforcing through the act of merging.

be unified by a

This alternative highlights the act of bringing different parts together to form a cohesive unit.

be fused by a

This alternative indicates a high degree of integration, suggesting that the elements are indistinguishable after merging.

be amalgamated by a

This alternative, less common, denotes a blending of different elements into a homogeneous mixture.

be joined by a

This alternative denotes a straightforward connection, lacking the implication of close integration.

be linked by a

This alternative suggests a connection or association, potentially without direct merging.

be connected by a

This alternative, similar to 'linked', emphasizes the act of establishing a relationship between distinct entities.

be synthesized by a

This alternative refers to the creation of something new by combining different elements or components.

FAQs

How can I use "be merged by a" in a sentence?

Use "be merged by a" to describe a process where multiple entities are combined into one, with a specific agent or tool facilitating the combination. For instance, "The datasets will be merged by a data integration tool".

What phrases are similar to "be merged by a"?

Alternatives include "be combined by a", "be integrated by a", or "be consolidated by a", each suggesting slightly different nuances of unification.

When is it appropriate to use the passive voice with "be merged by a"?

The passive voice with "be merged by a" is suitable when the action of merging is more important than the entity performing the action, or when the actor is unknown or unimportant. For example, "The companies were merged by a regulatory decision".

What are some common mistakes to avoid when using "be merged by a"?

Avoid using this phrase in active voice constructions or when a more direct and concise statement is possible. Overusing passive voice can make your writing sound less dynamic. For example, it's better to say "The team merged the reports" instead of "The reports were merged by the team" if the emphasis is on the team's action.