Used and loved by millions
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com
be lost more efficient
Grammar usage guide and real-world examplesUSAGE SUMMARY
The phrase "be lost more efficient" is not correct in English.
It seems to be an attempt to convey a concept related to efficiency in a context of being lost, but it lacks proper grammatical structure. Example: "If we want to navigate better, we should not be lost more efficient; instead, we need a clear map."
⚠ May contain grammatical issues
News & Media
Science
Formal & Business
Alternative expressions(3)
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Human-verified examples from authoritative sources
Exact Expressions
1 human-written examples
Moreover, robotics executives argue that even though blue-collar jobs will be lost, more efficient manufacturing will create skilled jobs in designing, operating and servicing the assembly lines, as well as significant numbers of other kinds of jobs in the communities where factories are.
News & Media
Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources
Similar Expressions
59 human-written examples
In mammals, for which natural selection is less efficient, such genes may be lost more often.
Science
This is more efficient than keeping the machines constantly full, because less helium is lost through evaporation.
News & Media
Such operations are losing ground to cheaper and more efficient alternatives, like gas-fired power plants and wind farms.
News & Media
Meanwhile, L.A. is losing revenue that could be collected through more efficient parking management — funds that could go toward improving sidewalks, bike lanes and transit stops.
News & Media
"Every day [the automakers] are losing sales to buyers who want more fuel-efficient cars today," adds Libby.
News & Media
The personal computer business trailed behind more efficient rivals, notably Dell Computer, and was losing money.
News & Media
Things, however, cannot be endlessly made more efficient without losing quality.
News & Media
How can government be made more efficient?
News & Media
"We'll be much more efficient".
News & Media
That may be a more efficient search.
News & Media
Expert writing Tips
Best practice
Reframe your sentence to use correct phrasing; instead of trying to combine being "lost" with "more efficient", separate the concepts. Focus on how to be more efficient in finding something if it's lost, or on becoming more efficient to prevent things from getting lost in the first place.
Common error
Avoid combining contradictory concepts such as being "lost" and "efficient". Efficiency implies a positive process, while being lost indicates a negative state. Instead, clarify whether you mean reducing the likelihood of getting lost or improving efficiency in a different context.
Source & Trust
84%
Authority and reliability
1.8/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested
Linguistic Context
The phrase "be lost more efficient" attempts to combine a state of being (lost) with an adverbial modifier (more efficient), creating a grammatically incorrect construction. Ludwig AI indicates that the phrase is not correct in English and lacks proper grammatical structure.
Frequent in
News & Media
33%
Science
33%
Formal & Business
33%
Less common in
Science
0%
News & Media
0%
Formal & Business
0%
Ludwig's WRAP-UP
In summary, the phrase "be lost more efficient" is grammatically incorrect and unconventional in English. Ludwig AI confirms that the phrase lacks proper grammatical structure. Although the intent might be to convey improving efficiency related to loss or misplacement, it's best to rephrase the sentence for clarity. Recommended alternatives include "become more efficient" or focusing on managing lost items more efficiently. To avoid misuse, ensure that you're not combining contradictory concepts, and always aim for clear, grammatically sound constructions in both formal and informal communication. Proper usage ensures that your intended message is accurately and effectively conveyed.
More alternative expressions(10)
Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:
Improve efficiency and reduce losses
Expands to include both improving efficiency and minimizing losses, making it more comprehensive.
Reduce waste and improve efficiency
Combines the concept of reducing waste with improving efficiency for a broader approach.
Minimize inefficiencies
Shifts the focus from being lost to reducing inefficiencies.
Become more efficient
Focuses on the action of improving efficiency, omitting the concept of being lost.
Operate more efficiently
Replaces 'be lost' with 'operate', changing the action but keeping the efficiency aspect.
Streamline processes
Focuses on making processes more efficient and straightforward, without mentioning loss.
Increase efficiency
Emphasizes the act of enhancing efficiency, without any notion of loss.
Be more effectively managed
Highlights effective management rather than a state of being lost but relates to performance.
Optimize resource allocation
Targets efficient use of resources, differing from the original phrase's focus on loss.
Be more competently handled
Shifts the emphasis to competent handling rather than efficiency in being lost.
FAQs
How can I rephrase "be lost more efficient" to make it grammatically correct?
Since "be lost more efficient" is grammatically incorrect, consider alternatives like "become more efficient" or "improve efficiency" to convey a similar idea without the grammatical error.
What is a more appropriate way to use 'efficient' in the context of something being lost?
Instead of saying "be lost more efficient", you could say "manage the lost item more efficiently" or "improve the efficiency of finding lost items". This clarifies that you're improving the process of dealing with loss, not the state of being lost itself.
Can 'efficient' be used with negative states or conditions?
While "efficient" generally describes positive processes, it can be used with negative conditions by focusing on the efficiency of dealing with them, rather than implying the condition itself is efficient. For example, "efficient handling of errors".
What are some contexts where aiming to be more efficient is beneficial?
Being more efficient is beneficial in various contexts, such as "streamlining business processes", "improving time management", or "optimizing resource allocation". In each case, efficiency leads to better outcomes and reduced waste.
Editing plus AI, all in one place.
Stop switching between tools. Your AI writing partner for everything—polishing proposals, crafting emails, finding the right tone.
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Source & Trust
84%
Authority and reliability
1.8/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested