Used and loved by millions

Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak quote

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak

CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com

MitStanfordHarvardAustralian Nationa UniversityNanyangOxford

be lost more efficient

Grammar usage guide and real-world examples

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "be lost more efficient" is not correct in English.
It seems to be an attempt to convey a concept related to efficiency in a context of being lost, but it lacks proper grammatical structure. Example: "If we want to navigate better, we should not be lost more efficient; instead, we need a clear map."

⚠ May contain grammatical issues

News & Media

Science

Formal & Business

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

1 human-written examples

Moreover, robotics executives argue that even though blue-collar jobs will be lost, more efficient manufacturing will create skilled jobs in designing, operating and servicing the assembly lines, as well as significant numbers of other kinds of jobs in the communities where factories are.

News & Media

The New York Times

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

59 human-written examples

In mammals, for which natural selection is less efficient, such genes may be lost more often.

This is more efficient than keeping the machines constantly full, because less helium is lost through evaporation.

News & Media

The Economist

Such operations are losing ground to cheaper and more efficient alternatives, like gas-fired power plants and wind farms.

News & Media

The New York Times

Meanwhile, L.A. is losing revenue that could be collected through more efficient parking management — funds that could go toward improving sidewalks, bike lanes and transit stops.

News & Media

Los Angeles Times

"Every day [the automakers] are losing sales to buyers who want more fuel-efficient cars today," adds Libby.

News & Media

Forbes

The personal computer business trailed behind more efficient rivals, notably Dell Computer, and was losing money.

News & Media

The New York Times

Things, however, cannot be endlessly made more efficient without losing quality.

News & Media

Forbes

How can government be made more efficient?

News & Media

The Economist

"We'll be much more efficient".

That may be a more efficient search.

News & Media

Huffington Post
Show more...

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Reframe your sentence to use correct phrasing; instead of trying to combine being "lost" with "more efficient", separate the concepts. Focus on how to be more efficient in finding something if it's lost, or on becoming more efficient to prevent things from getting lost in the first place.

Common error

Avoid combining contradictory concepts such as being "lost" and "efficient". Efficiency implies a positive process, while being lost indicates a negative state. Instead, clarify whether you mean reducing the likelihood of getting lost or improving efficiency in a different context.

Antonio Rotolo, PhD - Digital Humanist | Computational Linguist | CEO @Ludwig.guru

Antonio Rotolo, PhD

Digital Humanist | Computational Linguist | CEO @Ludwig.guru

Source & Trust

84%

Authority and reliability

1.8/5

Expert rating

Real-world application tested

Linguistic Context

The phrase "be lost more efficient" attempts to combine a state of being (lost) with an adverbial modifier (more efficient), creating a grammatically incorrect construction. Ludwig AI indicates that the phrase is not correct in English and lacks proper grammatical structure.

Expression frequency: Rare

Frequent in

News & Media

33%

Science

33%

Formal & Business

33%

Less common in

Science

0%

News & Media

0%

Formal & Business

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "be lost more efficient" is grammatically incorrect and unconventional in English. Ludwig AI confirms that the phrase lacks proper grammatical structure. Although the intent might be to convey improving efficiency related to loss or misplacement, it's best to rephrase the sentence for clarity. Recommended alternatives include "become more efficient" or focusing on managing lost items more efficiently. To avoid misuse, ensure that you're not combining contradictory concepts, and always aim for clear, grammatically sound constructions in both formal and informal communication. Proper usage ensures that your intended message is accurately and effectively conveyed.

FAQs

How can I rephrase "be lost more efficient" to make it grammatically correct?

Since "be lost more efficient" is grammatically incorrect, consider alternatives like "become more efficient" or "improve efficiency" to convey a similar idea without the grammatical error.

What is a more appropriate way to use 'efficient' in the context of something being lost?

Instead of saying "be lost more efficient", you could say "manage the lost item more efficiently" or "improve the efficiency of finding lost items". This clarifies that you're improving the process of dealing with loss, not the state of being lost itself.

Can 'efficient' be used with negative states or conditions?

While "efficient" generally describes positive processes, it can be used with negative conditions by focusing on the efficiency of dealing with them, rather than implying the condition itself is efficient. For example, "efficient handling of errors".

What are some contexts where aiming to be more efficient is beneficial?

Being more efficient is beneficial in various contexts, such as "streamlining business processes", "improving time management", or "optimizing resource allocation". In each case, efficiency leads to better outcomes and reduced waste.

ChatGPT power + Grammarly precisionChatGPT power + Grammarly precision
ChatGPT + Grammarly

Editing plus AI, all in one place.

Stop switching between tools. Your AI writing partner for everything—polishing proposals, crafting emails, finding the right tone.

Source & Trust

84%

Authority and reliability

1.8/5

Expert rating

Real-world application tested

Most frequent sentences: