Used and loved by millions

Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak quote

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak

CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com

MitStanfordHarvardAustralian Nationa UniversityNanyangOxford

be lost in

Grammar usage guide and real-world examples

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "be lost in" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used to describe a state of being deeply absorbed or engrossed in something, such as a thought, activity, or emotion. Example: "As she read the novel, she found herself completely lost in the story, forgetting about the world around her."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Science

Academia

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

"I'd be lost in the sauce".

News & Media

The New York Times

Nevertheless, some spirit-altering connotations may be lost in translation.

News & Media

The New Yorker

But, he warned, sometimes emoji can be lost in translation.

News & Media

The New York Times

Could that be lost in bartering with the EU?

News & Media

The Guardian

"The feel would be lost in machines," he said.

News & Media

The New York Times

But something extraordinary would be lost in the event.

News & Media

The New Yorker

This message seemed to be lost in translation.

News & Media

The Economist

That should not be lost in the narrative," he stated.

Seven people could be lost in this area.

Those with companions tend to be lost in each other.

All that could be lost in the Notre Dame blaze.

Show more...

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Use "be lost in" to vividly describe a state of deep absorption, such as "She was lost in thought", but be mindful of the context. This phrase can also denote physical disorientation, as in "They were lost in the woods".

Common error

Avoid using "be lost in" interchangeably when describing both physical and mental states without clear context. For example, while "He was lost in the city" describes a physical state, "He was lost in his dreams" describes a mental state. Ensure clarity to prevent ambiguity.

Antonio Rotolo, PhD - Digital Humanist | Computational Linguist | CEO @Ludwig.guru

Antonio Rotolo, PhD

Digital Humanist | Computational Linguist | CEO @Ludwig.guru

Source & Trust

88%

Authority and reliability

4.6/5

Expert rating

Real-world application tested

Linguistic Context

The primary grammatical function of "be lost in" is that of a phrasal verb. It acts as a predicate in sentences, describing a state of being either physically disoriented or deeply absorbed in something. Ludwig AI confirms this usage through numerous examples.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

47%

Science

27%

Academia

13%

Less common in

Formal & Business

7%

Reference

3%

Encyclopedias

3%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrasal verb "be lost in" is grammatically correct and very common, as validated by Ludwig AI. It serves to describe states of deep absorption or physical disorientation across various contexts. While it adapts well across different registers, ensuring clarity in usage is essential to avoid ambiguity. Semantically related alternatives include "become absorbed in" and "be immersed in", providing nuanced options for expressing similar ideas. Its presence in authoritative sources like The New York Times and The Guardian further solidifies its acceptability and broad applicability.

FAQs

How can I use "be lost in" in a sentence?

The phrase "be lost in" can describe being deeply absorbed in something (e.g. "She was lost in the music") or being physically disoriented (e.g. "They were lost in the forest").

What's a good alternative for "be lost in" when describing deep thought?

When describing deep thought or absorption, you can use phrases like "be engrossed in", "be absorbed in", or "be immersed in".

Can "be lost in" have negative connotations?

Yes, "be lost in" can sometimes carry negative connotations, especially when implying confusion or being overwhelmed. In such cases, consider alternatives like "be confused by" or "be overwhelmed by".

Is it correct to say "be lost at" instead of "be lost in"?

While "be lost at" might be used in some specific contexts (e.g. "be lost at sea"), "be lost in" is generally more versatile and commonly used for both physical and mental states of being lost or absorbed. Thus, "be lost in" should be preferenced.

ChatGPT power + Grammarly precisionChatGPT power + Grammarly precision
ChatGPT + Grammarly

Editing plus AI, all in one place.

Stop switching between tools. Your AI writing partner for everything—polishing proposals, crafting emails, finding the right tone.

Source & Trust

88%

Authority and reliability

4.6/5

Expert rating

Real-world application tested

Most frequent sentences: