Nevertheless, in our study the differences in the calculated evenness, based on the Pielou index (Additional file 1: Table S1), for R1 R3 and measured at the different sampling periods, did not show any uniform patterns, based on both T-RFLP and HTS results, suggesting that this index should also be carefully interpreted when used as a warning indicator.
Any data relating to this band should always be interpreted cautiously when using an MCT detector.
Based on our current data, results using these indices should be interpreted cautiously when used as an estimate of peripheral insulin sensitivity.
Dose readings delivered by extended-range neutron detectors should be interpreted cautiously when used in radiation fields containing a mixture of neutrons and high-energy gamma rays.
As such, it cannot be completely generalized to wheelchair propulsion, and it should be interpreted carefully when used on the SCI population.
On the one hand, small differences should be interpreted with caution when using the questionnaire, e.g. when significant differences are found in rank values but not in median response values.
Thus, the data of our study must be interpreted with caution when using propofol at mild to intermediate doses in obstructive jaundice.
This should be interpreted with caution when using these figures, since the number of critical care beds and all cause admissions included in ICNARC's CMP has increased by 40% and 130%, respectively across the same period.
The use of self-reported weight and height for surveillance studies in this setting appears acceptable; however this measure needs to be interpreted with care when used for individual patients.
Although information from unofficial sources should be interpreted with caution, when used in conjunction with traditional case reporting, real-time electronic surveillance can help public health authorities allocate resources in time to avert full-blown epidemics.
