Nevertheless, the retrospective study design of the present study and the small number of patients included should be considered when interpreting our results.
Several caveats should be considered when interpreting these data, including the fact that these analyses were exploratory, with no attempt to correct for multiplicity.
A number of significant methodological limitations should be considered when interpreting these findings, including the small number of respondents, as well as the subjective and retrospective nature of the survey data.
Some limitations of the present study should be considered when interpreting the results including the reliability of the clinical measurements of malocclusion, such as the Index of Orthodontic Treatment Need (IOTN), and Angle's classification of malocclusion.
Other factors to be considered when interpreting biomonitoring data include toxicologic factors, such as validity of the toxicologic or epidemiologic study, toxicokinetic considerations, adequacy of the sample size, reproducibility of the sample, and presence of confounding elements, and exposure factors, such as time since last exposure, average dose received, and frequency of exposures.
This study includes some limitations that should be considered when interpreting study results.
The present study included a number of strengths and limitations that should be considered when interpreting the findings.
Individual patient characteristics, including both ocular, as well as facial, need to be considered, when interpreting any visual field defect.
These should therefore be considered when interpreting biogeochemical proxies.
Readers should be cautioned when interpreting implant revision data.
